
Ignoring it is bliss, apparently
By Jo Best
Published: 17 May 2004 14:00 GMT
Internet users aren't up to much when it comes to reporting dodgy content on the web, research has revealed surfers are failing to let the authorities know when they come across content that breaks the law.
Research conducted by ICM Research for the Internet Service Providers' Association (ISPA) found that internet users were baffled by the legal niceties of publishing content to the web, with under one-third aware that those who post the content are legally responsible for it.
While those putting up sites with illegal content aren't likely to be too concerned about the consequences of their actions, home and business users might be accidentally risking legal repercussions.
Out of those surveyed, over one-fifth of people surveyed would show other people unlawful websites they found unintentionally breaking the law and one in eight said they wouldn't bother to report it to anyone.
So who should illegal content be reported to? The Internet Watch Foundation has a hotline to report instances of websites that break the law. The police are another obvious avenue and ISPs will take down flagrantly illegal content when informed.
But when things aren't so clear-cut in defamation cases or copyright infringement, for example ISPs have a harder time of it. An ISPA spokesman told silicon.com that where content was harder to judge, ISPs have to balance their legal responsibilities with the needs of customers.
"It's difficult for ISPs to know what to do. They're stuck with this conundrum they have to uphold the contract they have with customers and, at the same time, protect their customers' human rights and right to free speech," he said. "If it's defamatory, it will be taken down but ISPs don't have the expertise or authority to decide on that."
ISPA is calling for the government to step in and give them a bit of direction at the moment the industry adopts a more self-regulatory approach. The association would like to see a single procedure to decide the illegality of material and a central body to notify them of the results.
Hum. Would be better if the police were a bit mor...
Anonymous
Talk about making a story out of nothing! To put i...
Arthur Dent
Quote: one-fifth of people surveyed would show oth...
Anonymous
Call the police, and you may have more success!
...
Anonymous
I wouldn't be in too much of a hurry to blame the ...
Stuart Vine
Boundary Conditions/Authority Levels • Exercises judgment within defined practices and policies to recommend appropriate actions. This person ...
Manage and contribute to serious service incident reviews and convene internal post-incident reviews as necessary ensuring all necessary actions are ...
Lead the development of the partnering services work stream, agreeing agendas with the internal team and client, ensuring that material is prepared ...
Agenda Setters 2009
Welcome to the ninth annual Agenda Setters poll silicon.com's list of the top 50 most influential individuals in the technology and IT industries, from techies and CIOs to entrepreneurs and business leaders. Find out more in our latest special report.
Data Protection Strategies: Deduplication for More Efficient Backups
Dell PowerVault DL2100 Powered by CommVault - Spec Sheet
True Convergence Demands a Communication Service Provider that Embraces a Customer-Centric...
Learn how Performance Metrics for Telcomm Expense Management Drive new ROIs and SLAs
Stories from the web...
Copyright © 2008 CBS Interactive Limited. All rights reserved. Top of page
Mark Crichard Doing business with citizen developers: Beware the legal pitfalls Legal Eye: Make sure your business is protected from potential hazards
Tim Ferguson How CIOs can achieve post-recession success Q&A: McKinsey & Company on living in the 'new normal' business world