You are here: silicon.com > Management > Law & Policy

Law & Policy

US spits dummy over Korea's Microsoft bashing

Antitrust decision "goes beyond what is necessary or appropriate"

Tags: south korea, antitrust, korea, microsoft

By Declan McCullagh

Published: 8 December 2005 08:50 GMT

The Bush administration on Wednesday protested South Korea's decision to fine Microsoft roughly $32m and order the software company to redesign portions of its Windows operating system.

J Bruce McDonald, deputy assistant attorney general at the Justice Department's antitrust division, said in a statement: "Korea's remedy goes beyond what is necessary or appropriate to protect consumers, as it requires the removal of products that consumers may prefer."

The Korea Fair Trade Commission ruled that Microsoft violated South Korean law by bundling its Windows Media Service with the Windows Server operating system, as well as its media player and instant-messaging program with Windows. Microsoft will have to facilitate downloads of third-party media software and stop selling in Korea a version of its server software with Windows Media Services.

Microsoft said the decision did not properly apply Korean law and it will file an appeal.

Korea's case follows a massive fine of about $613m that the European Union slapped on Microsoft last year. The European government also demanded a version of Windows without a media player - though there has been scant demand for it.

At the time, US politicians from both major political parties protested the EU's move, saying it was of the "utmost importance" that the US continue to take the lead in overseeing US companies' business practices.

Perhaps fearing governments may line up by the dozens to take a chunk out of Microsoft's hide by wielding antitrust charges as a secondary form of taxation, the Bush administration is echoing that line. The administration argues that Microsoft is already regulated by US law and has been under court scrutiny because of a 2002 settlement.

McDonald said: "Sound antitrust policy should protect competition, not competitors, and must avoid chilling innovation and competition even by 'dominant' companies. Furthermore, we believe that regulators should avoid substituting their judgment for the market's by determining what products are made available to consumers."

Declan McCullagh writes for CNET News.com

  1. Zones
  2. Management
  3. Networks
  4. Software
  5. IT Services
  6. Hardware
  1. Verticals
  2. Public Sector
  3. Financial Services
  4. Retail & Leisure

  • Jobs
Experienced/Senior Games Programmer wanted - experience with Direct X

Our Client has developed patent-pending technology that enables consumers to play high-end, off-the-shelf PC games using dumb devices like ...

Enterprise/Application Architecture - Retail Application

The candidate will be expected to work with the business on long term technology and architectural innovation to ensure Nokia's retail channel ...

Director of Service Security, Privacy and Continuity

To support the services business to grow and scale in terms of customers, services and geography, it is absolutely vital that we have secure and ...

Agenda Setters 2009
Welcome to the ninth annual Agenda Setters poll – silicon.com's list of the top 50 most influential individuals in the technology and IT industries, from techies and CIOs to entrepreneurs and business leaders. Find out more in our latest special report.





Quick Sitemap Links: