You are here: silicon.com > Management > Law & Policy

Law & Policy

By Steve Ranger

Published: Monday 25 July 2005


Name

frank dreyer


Location

london


Occupation

banker


Comment

Will Biometric technology help to beat terrorists, or is that a false argument ? Think about it:
If biometric technology aims to prevent multiple passports from being issued to the same person under different identities, spies would be history. And that's impossible, so there would of course be sophisticated solutions for secret agents to get around that "bullet-proof" system.
Hence, sophisticated solutions can be bought for money, which "terrorist-organisations" don't seem to lack.
The terrorist threat is continously being used as a reason to introduce Biometric technology combined with Stalinian/Hitlerian data bases on citizens (see article " What data will ID cards store?" http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4630045.stm ), but if Biometric technology will not help beat terrorists;
What is the REAL reason the government wants Biometric technology ?



  1. Zones
  2. Management
  3. Networks
  4. Software
  5. IT Services
  6. Hardware
  1. Verticals
  2. Public Sector
  3. Financial Services
  4. Retail & Leisure

The Round-Up The Weekly Round-Up: 03.12.09 'Ere guv, you'll never guess who I had in the back of my cab the other day…'

Stuart Roberts Shared services - how to get it right in your business Recession boosts uptake


Agenda Setters 2009
Welcome to the ninth annual Agenda Setters poll – silicon.com's list of the top 50 most influential individuals in the technology and IT industries, from techies and CIOs to entrepreneurs and business leaders. Find out more in our latest special report.



Quick Sitemap Links: