Adrian Carey

Hemel Hempstead

ICT Consultant

Another example of a complete non-sequitor. Allowing people to see their pictures does not, in any way, demonstrate that speed cameras are not about revenue generation.

I would be more inclined to believe Mr Frampton, and the rest of the publically unaccocuntable speed partnership brigade, if he (they) were to publish:
* accident rates for the camera sites, showing the effects of the cameras over a sufficient period of time to take account of abnormal spikes and troughs;
* reasons for the particular speed limit in a particlar location, (i.e. why a 40 mph in that location when similar roads elsewhere have a 50 mph or a 60 mph;
* numbers of persecutions for tailgaters, people turning without signalling, undertaking, using mobile phones when driving, etc, etc.