By Marguerite Reardon
Published: Tuesday 23 March 2004
Email story to a Friend | Report Abuse
Name
Stephen
Location
England
Occupation
.
Comment
why not free up some major 'reserved' space as alot of IPv4 is taken up via this. as its something like this: (approx) 224.0.0.0 - 237.255.255.255
(approx) 96.0.0.0 - 126.255.255.255
I not saying that we should remove the following ranges:
10.0.0.0 - 10.255.255.255
192.168.0.0 - 192.168.255.255
but do we really need any more
private/reserved IPs taking up IPv4?
Agenda Setters 2009
Welcome to the ninth annual Agenda Setters poll – silicon.com's list of the top 50 most influential individuals in the technology and IT industries, from techies and CIOs to entrepreneurs and business leaders. Find out more in our latest special report.
Data Protection Strategies: Deduplication for More Efficient Backups
Dell PowerVault DL2100 Powered by CommVault - Spec Sheet
True Convergence Demands a Communication Service Provider that Embraces a Customer-Centric...
Learn how Performance Metrics for Telcomm Expense Management Drive new ROIs and SLAs
Copyright © 2008 CBS Interactive Limited. All rights reserved. Top of page
RSS Feeds
The Round-Up The Weekly Round-Up: 03.12.09 'Ere guv, you'll never guess who I had in the back of my cab the other day…'
Stuart Roberts Shared services - how to get it right in your business Recession boosts uptake