
"Microsoft is a difficult opponent"
By John Borland
Published: 15 January 2004 09:30 GMT
A Chicago federal judge has upheld a $512m patent verdict against Microsoft that could ultimately force major changes in many of the most common internet software products.
Judge James Zagel said he saw no reason to overturn an August jury verdict that said Microsoft's Internet Explorer web-browsing software had infringed on patent rights held jointly by small developer Eolas Technologies and the University of California.
As part of his decision, Zagel barred Microsoft from distributing versions of its web software that include the potentially infringing technology. However, he immediately put that injunction on hold until an appeal has run its course. Microsoft is expected to appeal immediately.
"This motion rehearses a set of arguments that failed the first time around," Zagel wrote in his opinion. "While I am not entirely comfortable with the large size of the judgment, it is not my comfort that matters."
The August ruling set off a mild panic in the web developer community, which fears it may have to change the way that many basic web page functions are created or triggered if Eolas is ultimately victorious in its suit.
The Eolas patent covers technology used to call up separate applications, such as a media player or document viewer, within a web page.
Web programmers have spent much of the past several months scouring programming history to find what is called "prior art", or evidence that other people had invented the technology before Eolas, in order to try to invalidate the patent. The US Patent and Trademark Office has opened a rare hearing to investigate the validity of the patent.
Microsoft has said that it believes that the Eolas patent will ultimately be found invalid, either by the courts or by the US Patent and Trademark Office. It has already released versions of IE that try to sidestep some of the patent's claims, and has advised other web developers to do the same.
A Microsoft spokesman said: "We remain confident that on appeal, when people hear this, they will see that, as we claimed, the patent is not valid. We don't think we violated anything even if it were valid."
Marty Lueck, an attorney for Eolas, applauded the ruling, in part because it would move the process to the appeals court more quickly.
"This forces the appeal process to begin and brings us another step closer to full resolution of case, which we would welcome," Lueck said. "Microsoft is a difficult opponent."
Eolas founder Michael Doyle said that the company would be happy to settle, but that Microsoft has not responded to Eolas' overtures.
John Borland writes for News.com
The current standards are all based on Microsoft Internet Explorer so .NET is the preferred option although ASP.NET is also desirable. My publice ...
Internal Sales Executive - Domain Management London 25k Base, 45k OTE + Excellent Benefits Our client is an integral part of leading group of ...
Observes strict compliance to licensing, copyright and trademark legislation A suitable candidate must demonstrate a good working knowledge of ...
Agenda Setters 2009
Welcome to the ninth annual Agenda Setters poll – silicon.com's list of the top 50 most influential individuals in the technology and IT industries, from techies and CIOs to entrepreneurs and business leaders. Find out more in our latest special report.
Power Solutions Article: High-Availability Virtualization with Dell EqualLogic Arrays...
Power Solutions Article:Â Power Solutions Article: Getting Started with Microsoft...
Customer Case Study:Â A L Filters
Solution Brief: Dell Equalogic PS Series Can Offer Robust, High-Availability Infrastructure...
Stories from the web...
Copyright © 2008 CBS Interactive Limited. All rights reserved. Top of page
Naked CIO Naked CIO: Social networks are useless for finding a job 'Quantity over quality' approach poisoning professional networks
Peter Cochrane Peter Cochrane's Blog: Uneconomics We must move away from short-termism to prevent next economic crisis