
Is this end for the anti-patent lobby?
Published: 7 March 2005 16:25 GMT
The European Council adopted the software patent directive on Monday, despite requests from Denmark, Poland and Portugal to reject it.
An EU Council spokeswoman said on Monday morning that the Computer Implemented Inventions Directive had been adopted but was unable to give more details.
According to Florian Mueller, an anti-patent campaigner who watched the public part of the meeting, a minister from Luxembourg said the directive is being adopted to ensure that the Council adheres to its processes and to avoid creating problems for other directives.
"We are adopting the position for institutional reasons so as not to create a precedent which might have a consequence of creating future delays in other processes," the minister said, according to Mueller.
Last week it was reported that Denmark would attempt to have the directive listed as a B-item, rather than an A-item, allowing the text to be renegotiated. The Luxembourg minister admitted that Denmark, Poland and Portugal would have preferred the directive to be listed as a B-item, according to Mueller.
The directive will now be passed to European Parliament, which can reject or amend the proposal, for a second reading.
The Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure (FFII) accused the EU Council of ignoring the views of both the national parliament that spoke out against the directive and the European Parliament, which demanded that the directive be restarted.
"This is a very sad day for democracy and casts a very dark shadow over the European Constitution, which will give the Council even more power," said the FFII in a statement.
Mueller agreed that the Council's decision was "undemocratic". He said that getting the Parliament to reject or amend the proposal could be difficult.
"The hurdle is very high as we need an absolute majority of every member of parliament, which means 367 MEPs for every amendment to the directive," said Mueller.
Hugo Lueders, the director of public policy at pro-patent organisation CompTIA, said he is pleased the Council has adopted the directive. He claims software patents are needed to ensure that the EU can keep to the goals set by the Lisbon Agenda - that the EU will become the world's most competitive and dynamic knowledge-driven economy by 2010.
"We think this directive is overdue," said Lueders. "It's extremely urgent to proceed with the Lisbon Agenda, of which this directive is a key element."
How will Europe become the most competitive and dy...
Carl Maycock
The Patent Act 1977 enshrined my right as a softwa...
Eur Ing Christopher Thoday
As an independent and innovative software develope...
Michael Kay
Why should software patents be a special case?
...
CPK Smithies
I have an excellent opportunity for people with a thorough knowledge of Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit Regulations looking to get into or to ...
Deliverables: Establish capacity and capability across the organisation to support the effective delivery of its One Council agenda. local Authority ...
Seasoned SAP Professional required by a leading European Manufacturer to take on a role as Senior Program Manager / Project Director of EU SAP ...
Agenda Setters 2009
Welcome to the ninth annual Agenda Setters poll – silicon.com's list of the top 50 most influential individuals in the technology and IT industries, from techies and CIOs to entrepreneurs and business leaders. Find out more in our latest special report.
The new information agenda:Do you have one?
Transform your Multi-Channel Customer Experience: Advantages of Customer Communications...
Solution Brief: Dell Equalogic PS Series Can Offer Robust, High-Availability Infrastructure...
Solutions Brief:Â Dell EqualLogic PS Series and Microsoft WS2008 Hyper-V:Â Enabling...
Stories from the web...
Copyright © 2008 CBS Interactive Limited. All rights reserved. Top of page
Naked CIO Naked CIO: Is IT responsible for workers' output and errors? CIOs must take on more accountability to become boardroom leaders
Naked CIO Naked CIO: Social networks are useless for finding a job 'Quantity over quality' approach poisoning professional networks